Do you want to know what all are the problems that exist in India? Then, go and watch Slumdog Millionaire(SM). The director has packed the movie with poverty,religious riots, poor sanitation, theft, beggary, mafia and prostitution. As reality bites, the movie does create a depressing hangover. But the substance of the movie is the same like that of our usual bollywood movies.
However,the screenplay is strikingly refreshing. How Jamal got all the answers right is conveyed through a series of incidents from his own life. The author of the book Q&A (from which the movie is adapted), Vikas Swaroop should be appreciated for the gripping screen play. Another novel aspect in this film is the Hindi dialogues are not shown as sub-titles. Instead, the translation of the dialogues are shown near the characters that deliver the dialogues. However, for no reason all the characters start speaking English, abrubtly( from their adolescent period). I understand that the director,Donny Boyle could have included the Hindi dialogues in the beginning to retain the nativity. But it would have made a big difference had the movie been made in Hindi completely.May be the director want the English-speaking audience to be much receptive to his film.In my opinion, if the substance of the movie is good, the audience will give a damn about the language in which it was shot.Had the director used Hindi completely, the movie could have been much more authentic and credible.
In the same way, some of the scenes in the film appeared to be too dramatic.For instance, in a particular scene, Jamal looks for Salim's name in the database, which will lead to the reunion of the brothers. How did he manage to find his brother in the database of a call center? Similarly, the sudden and unexplained change in the attitude of Jamal before the climax.
On the other hand, whatever is said and done against the movie, not a single day passes without a news about it. Armed with many prestigious awards and the much coveted Oscars, SM is undoubtedly the most happening movie of this millennium, not only in India but, in the whole world. But if you have still not watched SM and planning to watch it with your expectations soaring high , then it might certainly fall short of your expectations. Against the popular beliefs, the director has not bombarded or hyped the situation in the slums in India. But has mercilessly exposed the murky side of Dharavi in Mumbai.He has presented the suituation in the slum without refining or rather I would prefer to say, giving a raw feeling to it.We cannot deny that they do not happen. They certainly happen.But, Donny Boyle could be blamed for communicating that Dharavi and India are the one and the same. The westners could deem the condition of Dharavi as the condition in India, which is certainly not.
Beyond the begging bowls and hunger pangs, the movie has a soulful love story.However, again, the love between Jamal (Dev Patel) and Latika (Frieda Pinto) is not anything new that our Bollywood movies have missed.It is again the same love story in the back drop of poverty and crime. The only saving grace is that there is no duet of Latika and Jamal, supressing the flow of the movie, instead the duet(Jai Ho) is placed at the end of the movie along with the moving credits. The music is definitely not the magnum opus creation of Rahman, however, it compliments the film. Can he add pepper to the milk sweets? He has given his best within the scope of the movie.
The director should be appreciated for the perfect casting. In particular, the youngest Latika, (Rubina Ali) and the youngest Salim (Azharuddin Mohammad Ismail) perfectively fit their roles.
It is very surprising to know that both Rubina and Ismail are actually from the slums. They have handled their roles with a touch of professionalism. Even other actors such as Dev Patel, Frieda Pinto, and Anil Kapoor have done a good job. Similarly, the cinematography is excellent. The cinematographer, Anthony Dod Mantle brings the filthy atmosphere of the slums alive.
With this, I complete my review of the much coveted and Oscar-award winning movie, Slumdog Millionaire. No matter whether I liked the film or not, I am happy to have witnessed an Osacr award winning Indian movie in my lifetime.
18 comments:
somehow i din;t like the movie at all Poorna..I felt it as a complete crap...
Please check my review on it
http://lancelot-oneofakind.blogspot.com/2009/03/slumdogs-letter-to-ampas-fellow-slumdog.html
then we can argue :P
@ Poorna
thank u for the rich comment...
and my entire point is that...why such a song when the film doesn't need it??
Hi Lancelot! i agree with you :)I really appreciate your view.but don't you think the screenplay, cinematography and small small technicalities been good in this movie?
I wont say Screen play is new- there are better screen play technics than this - according to me the Movie Memento had the best screenplay ever...this screenplay is just a slight change of that screenplay...and cinematography??? if u had seen the otehr contestants for the oscar
Curious case of benjamin button - u will not appreciate this cinematography as best...so on a comparative basis this movie is not an oscar material girl...
hmmn.....i agree with u that this movie is not an Oscar material.But we can watch it once (can't comment much on your views because i have not watched any of the movies that u have mentioned)
@ Kartik
dei nara vaaya,
please be clear with you stance, either u compare SDM with the other english movies which was contested in Oscar or compare it with other Tamil or Hindi movies - nee eppadi compare pannalum padam oothi mudikkum... enna padam onnum pramatham illai - naa sonna mathiri same movie if taken by an indian director - padam film fare award enna, Vijay TV award kooda vaangathu...padathaa venaa Lollu Sabha la pottu nalla kalaipaanga- serila porantha kolanthaya english pesaa vechi...
P.S: Modha entha postunnu parthu comment panna kathukko...
//Poorna said...
hmmn.....i agree with u that this movie is not an Oscar material.But we can watch it once (can't comment much on your views because i have not watched any of the movies that u have mentioned)
//
WE Can watch it once kaaga - intha movieya thalaia thooki vechukittu pesurathu konjam over...enna padam eduthuttanu ellarum pesuranganu puriyala- ithulla congress party vera avanungala than Indiavukku oscar vanthuchunu comedy panraanunga...
Ithu Kartikoda blogukku vantha comments atha inga posturen...
And as the great bong says
Let’s say I made a movie about the US where an African-American boy born in the hood, has his mother sell him to a pedophile pop icon, after which he gets molested by a priest from his church, following which he gets tied up to the back of a truck and dragged on the road by KKK clansmen. Then he is arrested and sodomized by a policeman with a rod, after which he is attacked by a gang of illegal immigrants, and then uses these life experiences to win “Beauty and The Geek”.
Even though each of these incidents have actually happened in the United States of America, I would be accused of spinning a fantastic yarn that has no grounding in reality, that has no connection to the “American experience” and my motivations would be questioned, no matter how cinematically spectacular I made my movie.
Today When I was watching this India-New Zealand Cricket match the statdium was full of Indians who were shouting like hell. The NZ commentator apparently thrilled at seeing such a large crowd for a cricket match in their country tries to explain the crowds enthusiasm
” I love these Indians…Look how they cheer their heroes..Jus like they show in that movie slumdog millionaire where that boy jumps into that thing just to get an autograph…these things must be new to us Newzealanders..boy oh boy..!!”
Now now that for me is a typical western mindset and slumdog just enforces that myth.
There is a difference between clever film-making and great film-making. Make no mistake, Danny Boyle is immensely clever. “Slumdog Millionaire” is made as an out-and-out “crowd-pleaser” through proper audience-targeting which is done in the same careful way the vijays target the lovey-dovey high school/college crowd and the Vijay kanths target the uber-patriots.
Athuvum atha appreciate panni Kartik post pottathai vanmayaaga kandithu 45vathu vattathin saarbaga indru iravu seriyaga 7 mukkal manniku annan Kaki Tea Kudippar...
@ Lancelot : can't agree much with you that the movie is a complete crap..... showing India in a bad light should be condemned...no doubt about it:) but we shd remember one thing, the movie is a mere adaption from Viks Swaroop's Q&A.First, we should know whether the author (who is an Indian) has himself portrayed India in such a way in his book.... no matter what it is, the director should be blamed for being irresponsible in his portrayal about some other country ( i have mentioned this in my review too) Even I won't call the movie an extraordinary stuff and all....but that shd not stop us from appreciating the good aspects, such as cinematography, screen play etc and regarding congress owning the success, if so, it is bad :(
@ Karthik: "dei nara vaaya" ..........,........."Modha entha postunnu parthu comment panna kathukko.."
so sad :( (he....he...he)
Fair enough :))
and Kartik deserves that don't pity him...
Hi Lancelot! at last we reached an agreement. Anyways, your review of this movie is fabulous, keep up the good work :)
nandri hein..but thats not a review at all :P what I wrote was just a letter expressing my feelings...for my review u have to check this...
http://lancelot-oneofakind.blogspot.com/2009/03/delhi-6-review.html
@ Lancelot :Thanks for the link...will checkout :)
poorna you have wasted your time and money by watching SDM .Anyways its your views..
"Do you want to know what all are the problems that exist in India"
Nobody will accept your lines by referring this film ..
You better watch nan kadavul and write a review ,instaed of praising a british entry to the oscars .
Dont check poorna!!! He has given a comical review and written a hyper comical letter!! :P :P He hates Danny Boyle because he has a little crush on Printo!! :P
@Karthi :I appreciate your views Karthi! we shd not much care about Oscars.It's after all, a british recognition.I agree on this.
But While watching this film, i didnt bother whether it's an indian production or a british production. I am a viewer and the movie shd appeal to me and while reviewing it, i dont care whether an indian directed it or a westerner directed it. Can we deny anything that danny boyle showed in this movie? On the other hand, i agree that this movie doesn't have any elements in it to have won an oscar.Even i didn't like the movie much......if u notice i have pointed out many aspects that i dnt like in this movie.All that i want to say is just because it's a british production, we cannot blindly say it's crap...it has got few gud points in it such as cinematography, screen play etc
@Karthik: oh that's the secret? hmn...poor boy....let's give him his due credit...it is really a well written post (in terms of presentation):)
//Karthik said...
Dont check poorna!!! He has given a comical review and written a hyper comical letter!! :P :P He hates Danny Boyle because he has a little crush on Printo!! :P
//
cha Cha Danny boyle has adopted Printo - so he is like my father in law...so i don't hate him...
@Lancelot: //cha Cha Danny boyle has adopted Printo - so he is like my father in law...so i don't hate him...//
is it so? but does Printo aware of this ? (he...he...he)
Post a Comment